LinkedIn Visibility Boost: Women Find Success When Pretending as Male Users
Do your professional networking connections recognizing you as a thought leader? Are hordes of respondents applauding your insights on growing your business? Do recruiters reaching out to discuss opportunities?
Should that not be the case, the explanation could be your gender.
The Test: Changing Profile Gender for Better Visibility
Numerous women joined a collective professional network test recently after viral posts suggested that changing their profile gender to "male" enhanced their network presence.
Some participants modified their profiles to incorporate what they called "masculine-oriented" language - adding results-driven professional jargon like "drive", "transform" and "expedite". Anecdotally, their exposure also improved.
Systemic Preference Questions Brought Up
The improved metrics has led some to speculate whether a built-in gender bias in the platform's system favors male users who employ professional networking terminology.
Similar to many large networking sites, LinkedIn employs a computerized system to decide which content are shown to which members - promoting some while reducing others.
Platform Response
Through a blog post, LinkedIn recognized the trend but stated it does not consider "personal characteristics" when determining post visibility. Rather, the company mentioned that "hundreds of signals" affect how content perform.
Modifying profile gender in your settings does not influence how your posts appears in search or feed.
Individual Results
A social media consultant, who changed her pronouns to "he/him" and her name to "Simon E", described remarkable outcomes.
"The statistics I'm observing show a 1,600% increase in profile views and a thirteen-fold jump in impressions," she commented.
Megan Cornish, a marketing expert, started testing after noticing her audience decrease significantly.
The Process
- Initially, she changed her gender to "man"
- Subsequently, she used AI tools to rewrite her professional summary using "masculine-oriented" language
- Finally, she recycled previous content with comparable "assertive" language
The result was instantaneous: a more than fourfold rise in reach within one week.
The Negative Aspect
Despite the positive results, Cornish expressed dissatisfaction with the method.
"Previously, my posts were softer - concise and insightful, but also friendly and human," she explained. "Now, the bro-coded version was forceful and self-assured - like a Caucasian man swaggering around."
She abandoned the test after seven days, stating "Each day I continued, and results got better, I became more frustrated."
Mixed Results
Not all testers encountered favorable results. One writer who modified both her profile gender to "man" and her race to "white" described a decrease in visibility and interaction.
"We know there's algorithmic bias, but it's very challenging to understand how it operates in specific cases or why," she remarked.
Broader Implications
These experiments occur alongside ongoing discussions about LinkedIn's unique position as both a business platform and social space.
Recent changes in the past few months have reportedly resulted in female creators experiencing significantly reduced exposure, resulting in informal experiments where identical posts by men and women received dramatically unequal audience engagement.
System Details
According to LinkedIn, the platform uses AI systems to categorize and spread posts based on various elements, including post content and the user's professional identity.
The company claims it regularly evaluates its algorithms, including "checks for inequalities based on gender."
A spokesperson proposed that recent declines in some users' reach might originate from increased competition due to more content on the network.
Changing Landscape
According to a tester observed, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be increasing on the network.
"People often view LinkedIn as more businesslike and refined," she commented. "That's changing. It's turning into increasingly aggressive and less controlled."